Protecting a Vulnerable Child: Kyle and Sheila Johnson

Kyle and Sheila Johnson, both 33, were court ordered to the Juvenile Court Clinic for Care and Protection (C&P) Parenting evaluations after their 17-month-old daughter, Caroline, was found to have fractures in both legs consistent with nonaccidental trauma. The couple was divorcing, and Caroline had been placed in Department of Children and Families (DCF) custody with a kinship caregiver. The Juvenile Court Clinician interviewed each parent, reviewed medical and legal records from multiple states, and consulted collateral sources to assess each parent’s history, functioning, and caregiving capacity. 

Review of Parents’ Functioning

The evaluation showed that Mr. Johnson had no prior legal or child protective involvement and no history of mental health or substance use disorders. He showed understandable anxiety related to the DCF investigation and the dissolution of his marriage, but no broader psychiatric concerns. He acknowledged poor judgment in leaving Caroline in Mrs. Johnson’s care despite concerns about her mental health and possible substance misuse, but otherwise demonstrated stable functioning.

Mrs. Johnson’s records reflected a long-standing pattern of opioid misuse, repeated psychiatric hospitalizations, a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, and criminal charges for filing false reports against former partners. Her history also included the removal of two older children due to abuse and refusal to engage in treatment, ultimately leading to termination of her parental rights in another state. Recent medical records showed she was receiving prescriptions for opioids from multiple providers. During the evaluation, she denied all diagnoses, claimed her records were falsified, and acknowledged only chronic pain.

Evaluation of Strengths, Limitations and Risks

The Juvenile Court Clinician was ordered to evaluate each parent’s strengths, limitations, and associated risks, not to determine who caused Caroline’s injuries. Mrs. Johnson’s active substance misuse, untreated mental illness, denial of problems, and longstanding noncompliance with services were identified as significant risk factors. Mr. Johnson’s primary risk was his past decision-making regarding Mrs. Johnson’s caregiving role.

Juvenile Court Clinic Recommendations

To support safe reunification, in addition to close DCF monitoring, the Clinician recommended Mrs. Johnson participate in intensive outpatient substance use treatment, consult with a medical provider regarding medication-assisted treatment, undergo random drug screens, and engage in psychiatric and therapeutic care for bipolar disorder. For Mr. Johnson, recommendations included a nurturing father’s program to strengthen parenting skills and individual therapy to address anxiety and relationship patterns. 

The Court relied heavily on the Clinician’s insights and recommendations. Ultimately, Mrs. Johnson’s parental rights were terminated due to her repeated failure to comply with services. Mr. Johnson completed services and was reunited with Caroline after supportive services were in place.

To protect confidentiality, MAJCC does not use real names or identifying features in case examples.

---

1 Care and Protection: a matter filed in Juvenile Court alleging that a child under age 18 is at risk of neglect or abuse. (See full definition in the Glossary).

2 To work in the Juvenile Court Clinics, clinicians must become Certified Juvenile Court Clinicians through DMH-directed specialized training with on-site supervised clinical work conductedmat the Juvenile Court Clinics.