MAJCC’s Advocacy Goal for FY19

Massachusetts Alliance of Juvenile Court Clinics

(Line Item 5055-0000)

Every year thousands of the Commonwealth’s most vulnerable children and families appear before the Massachusetts Juvenile Courts.  Over 70% face a combination of mental health and behavioral problems, medical issues, substance abuse, histories of abuse and neglect, learning disabilities, and cultural issues. The Juvenile Court Clinics consult to the Court on the most complicated cases.

The Juvenile Court Clinics were established with the statewide Juvenile Court in 1993.  Currently the Juvenile Court is in a period of unprecedented change.  Since 2014, it has sustained a significant increase in the number of Care and Protection cases,* due to a continued rise in filings for cases of abuse and neglect.  In 2013 Raise the Age legislation brought 17-year-olds under the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court, and in 2012, Child Requiring Assistance (CRA) legislation replaced what was formerly CHINS (Child in Need of Services).  Most recently the Legislature has been actively debating additional changes based on the advances in understanding adolescent brain development and the need to divert youth from court involvement in order to disrupt the school to prison pipeline. All of these factors impact services provided by the Juvenile Court Clinics.

We want to thank the Legislature for all its support for the Juvenile Court Clinics over the years. In FY18 Senate Ways and Means provided a $1.5 Million increase for Forensic Services with $600,000 designated for the Juvenile Court Clinics, which did not prevail through Conference Committee.  Now, in FY19 we seek funding at the FY18 SW&M level to recruit and retain highly specialized clinicians to meet the needs of:

  • Children with substance use problems requiring emergency out-of-home care through a court order or community-based out-patient services.
  • Children who are Dual-Status Youth, involved in both the child welfare and the juvenile justice system.
  • Children falling between the cracks of state agencies such as DCF, DMH and DYS.
  • Children who are older. Since September 2013, the Juvenile Court has had jurisdiction over 17-year-olds, youth previously served by the Adult District Court.
  • Children failing to improve despite intensive, comprehensive home-based services.
  • Children failing to meet criteria for Competence to Stand Trial and require repeat evaluations of their competence as frequently as every six months.
  • Children diverted from the Juvenile Court process through initiatives such as the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI).
  • Parents before the Juvenile Court due to abuse and neglect of children who are often quite young.

The Role of the Juvenile Court Clinics

Psychologists, social workers, and other mental health professionals at the Juvenile Court Clinics provide court-ordered evaluations, referral, and limited intervention services. All clinicians must be specially trained and credentialed by DMH. The Juvenile Court Clinics assist the Court in balancing the interests among child- or family-centered interventions, public safety, and protection of children from abuse and neglect, while providing the following kinds of services:

  • Emergency evaluations of youth in crisis—for example, an evaluation of a 15-year-old boy who threatened to kill himself while at Court, or a Section 35 evaluation of a girl brought in for an emergency substance use evaluation because of her opioid abuse while on the run.
  • Comprehensive psychosocial evaluations—such as evaluating a 12-year-old boy with an extensive trauma history who injured another youth. During the evaluation, the clinician also works with the family, school and child-serving agencies in the community to seek appropriate treatment and service planning.
  • Participation in diversionary, alternative pathways, and community-based initiatives—for example, participation in the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI), Dual-Status Youth (DSY)

*Trial Court Case Statistics.

Programs, Drug Treatment Courts, System of Care (SOC) meetings, and the Alternative Pathways Program.

  • Evaluations to assess Competency to Stand Trial—for example, an evaluation of whether a 10-year-old boy, charged with assault and battery after he injured a classmate in a fight at school, could assist his lawyer in participating in his defense. The need for competency evaluations is rising as more youth come before the Juvenile Court with mental health issues, cognitive limitations, or immaturity.
  • Specialized risk assessments and evaluations of substance abuse, sexual offending, aggressive behavior and fire setting—behavior typically related to a range of complex underlying problems. All evaluations include recommendations for appropriate treatment.
  • Specialized evaluations in Care and Protection cases. These include evaluations of parenting capacity, evaluations of mental health concerns, and competency of a parent to assist counsel in court proceedings.
  • Consultation to the Court and the community—Consultation to families, schools, community providers, state agencies, and others regarding how the complex and rapidly changing service delivery systems may prevent a child’s further court involvement or the need for more intrusive and extensive interventions.

Cost Benefits of Juvenile Court Clinics

  • Research indicates that saving one high-risk youth from heavy drug use, dropping out of school, and a life of crime saves society an average of $5 Million.
  • Mental illnesses are serious medical illnesses that fall along a continuum of severity. Without treatment the consequences of mental illness for the individual and society are staggering—unnecessary disability, unemployment, substance abuse, homelessness, inappropriate incarceration, suicide, and wasted lives—costing 100 billion dollars each year in the United States, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness.


*An individual exhibiting behavioral or psychological symptoms that impact multiple life areas or create distress.

**A mental disorder so severe that an individual’s ability to perform routine daily tasks is significantly impaired.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s